The Replication Network

Furthering the Practice of Replication in Economics

Menu

  • HOME
    • Why Replications?
    • Organizers
  • RESEARCH
    • Publishing
    • Replication Studies
  • FROM MEMBERS
    • Publications
    • Working Papers
  • GUEST BLOGS
  • NEWS & EVENTS
  • MEMBERSHIP
    • List of Members
    • Join

National Science Foundation Now Funding Replication Studies. In Neuroscience.

  Posted on 17th March 2018 by replicationnetwork

  Leave a Comment

[From the post “Dear Colleague Letter: Achieving New Insights through Replicability and Reproducibility” published at nsf.gov]
“The National Science Foundation’s (NSF) Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences (SBE) encourages submission of proposals that target reproducibility and replicability efforts in data-intensive domains and that specifically rely on analysis of neuroimaging or neuroelectric data … Research questions should fall within the content domain of any of the following NSF programs: Cognitive Neuroscience, Perception, Action, and Cognition, and Science of Learning. NSF expects that these activities will aid in verification of prior findings, disambiguate among alternative hypotheses and serve to build a community of practice that engages in thoughtful reproducibility and replicability efforts. The suggested research must demonstrate clear potential for generating new scientific advances and discoveries, beyond simply rejecting or corroborating prior findings.”
To read more, click here.

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
Like Loading...

 Category: NEWS & EVENTS      Tags: Grants, National Science Foundation, Neuroscience, NSF, replication, United States

← Postdiction, Prediction, and Preregistration
Reproducibility crisis? What reproducibility crisis? →

Leave a comment Cancel reply

Search for:
rss Subscribe via RSS
Tags
Andrew Gelman BITSS Brian Nosek Data sharing economics Journal policies Meta-analysis null hypothesis significance testing Open Science p-hacking p-values Pre-registration Psychology publication bias Registered Reports replication replication crisis replications Reproducibility Transparency
Blogroll
  • Berkeley Initiative for Transparency in the Social Sciences
  • Curate Science
  • Political Science Replications
  • Replication Wiki
  • Retraction Watch
  • Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science
Recent Posts
  • REED: You Can Calculate Power Retrospectively — Just Don’t Use Observed Power
  • ROODMAN: Appeal to Me – First Trial of a “Replication Opinion”
  • AoI*: “Introducing Synchronous Robustness Reports” by Bartos et al. (2025)
  • AoI*: “The Sources of Researcher Variation in Economics” by Huntington-Klein et al. (2025)
  • AoI*: “Same data, different analysts: variation in effect sizes due to analytical decisions in ecology and evolutionary biology” by Gould et al. (2025)

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Comment
  • Reblog
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • The Replication Network
    • Join 105 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • The Replication Network
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d