The Replication Network
Furthering the Practice of Replication in Economics
Archives
Invitation to Participate in a Survey on How Results Influence Journal Publication
Researchers at Cardiff University (Chris Chambers, Ben Meghreblian) are seeking participants in a survey exploring the extent to which the results of a research study influence publication in the peer-reviewed literature. The study takes about 5-10 minutes and is part…
Read MoreWhich Journals in Your Discipline Score Best on the TOP Criteria? There’s an App for That
[Excerpts taken from the article “New Measure Rates Quality of Research Journals’ Policies to Promote Transparency and Reproducibility”, published by the Center for Open Science at their website.] “Today, the Center for Open Science launches TOP Factor, an alternative to journal…
Read MoreHave Registered Reports Uncovered Massive Publication Bias? Evidence from Psychology
[Excerpts taken from the preprint, “An excess of positive results: Comparing the standard Psychology literature with Registered Reports” by Anne Scheel, Mitchell Schijen, and Daniël Lakens, posted at PsyArXiv] “Registered Reports (RRs) are a new publication format…Before collecting data, authors…
Read MoreRegistered Reports 2.0
[Excerpt taken from the article “What’s next for Registered Reports?” by Chris Chambers, published in Nature] “For the past six years, I have championed Registered Reports (RRs), a type of research article that is radically different from conventional papers. The…
Read MoreLesson Learned from Registered Reports From Somebody Who Was There at the Beginning
[Excerpts taken from “The registered reports revolution: Lessons in cultural reform” by Chris Chambers, published in Significance, a publication of the Royal Statistical Society”] “On 12 November 2012, as my train sped towards London, I received one of the most…
Read MoreLessons Learned from the Pre-Results Review Pilot at the Journal of Development Economics One Year On
[From the blog “Pre-results Review at the Journal of Development Economics: Lessons learned so far” by Andrew Foster, Dean Karlan, Edward Miguel and Aleksandar Bogdanoski, posted at Development Impact at World Bank Blogs] “In March 2018, the Journal of Development…
Read MoreReproducibility in Registered Reports: Lots of Room for Improvement
[From the paper, “Analysis of Open Data and Computational Reproducibility in Registered Reports in Psychology” by Pepijn Obels, Daniel Lakens, Nicholas Coles, & Jaroslav Gottfried, posted at PsyArXiv Preprints] “Recently, scholars have started to empirically examine the extent to which data…
Read MoreNot Only That, Effect Sizes from Registered Reports Are Also Much Lower
[In a recent post at TRN, we highlighted that positive results were drastically lower in registered reports. In this post, we report findings about effect sizes. Excerpts are taken from “The Meaningfulness of Effect Sizes in Psychological Research: Differences Between…
Read MorePositive Findings are Drastically Lower in Registered Reports
[From slides prepared for the talk “Positive result rates in psychology: Registered Reports compared to the conventional literature” by Mitchell Schijen, Anne Scheel, and Daniël Lakens, presented at Open Science 2019 @ZPID, Trier , and posted at OSF] Conclusion: “Positive result rate in…
Read More
The Replication Network 
You must be logged in to post a comment.