The Replication Network

Furthering the Practice of Replication in Economics

Menu

  • HOME
    • Why Replications?
    • Organizers
  • RESEARCH
    • Publishing
    • Replication Studies
  • FROM MEMBERS
    • Publications
    • Working Papers
  • GUEST BLOGS
  • NEWS & EVENTS
  • MEMBERSHIP
    • List of Members
    • Join

Findings from a Registered Replication Project: Another Psychology Hypothesis Fails to Replicate

  Posted on 31st October 2016 by replicationnetwork

  Leave a Comment

[From the website of the Association for Psychological Science] “A coordinated replication effort conducted across 17 labs found no evidence that surreptitiously inducing people to smile or frown affects their emotional state. The findings of the replication project are published as part of a Registered Replication Report (RRR) in Perspectives on Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.”  To read more, click here. 

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
Like Loading...

 Category: NEWS & EVENTS      Tags: EJ.Wagenmakers, Facial Feedback Hypothesis, Perspectives on Psychological Science, Psychology, Registered Replication Reports

← Registered Replications? There’s a Course for That
Prediction Markets for Social Science Replication Project Opening Soon →

Leave a comment Cancel reply

Search for:
rss Subscribe via RSS
Tags
Andrew Gelman BITSS Brian Nosek Data sharing economics Journal policies Meta-analysis null hypothesis significance testing Open Science p-hacking p-values Pre-registration Psychology publication bias Registered Reports replication replication crisis replications Reproducibility Transparency
Blogroll
  • Berkeley Initiative for Transparency in the Social Sciences
  • Curate Science
  • Political Science Replications
  • Replication Wiki
  • Retraction Watch
  • Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science
Recent Posts
  • REED: You Can Calculate Power Retrospectively — Just Don’t Use Observed Power
  • ROODMAN: Appeal to Me – First Trial of a “Replication Opinion”
  • AoI*: “Introducing Synchronous Robustness Reports” by Bartos et al. (2025)
  • AoI*: “The Sources of Researcher Variation in Economics” by Huntington-Klein et al. (2025)
  • AoI*: “Same data, different analysts: variation in effect sizes due to analytical decisions in ecology and evolutionary biology” by Gould et al. (2025)

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Comment
  • Reblog
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • The Replication Network
    • Join 105 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • The Replication Network
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d