Category: GUEST BLOGS


SIMCHI-LEVI: Behavioral Science’s Credibility Is At Risk. Replication Studies Can Help

NOTE: This blog is a repost of one originally published at the Informs blogsite (click here). We thank David Simchi-Levi for permission to repost. Several scientific disciplines have been conducting replication initiatives to investigate the reliability of published research results….

Read More

AoI*: “High replicability of newly discovered social-behavioural findings is achievable” by Protzko et al. (2023)

[*AoI = “Articles of Interest” is a feature of TRN where we report abstracts of recent research related to replication and research integrity.] ABSTRACT (taken from the article) “Failures to replicate evidence of new discoveries have forced scientists to ask…

Read More

AoI*: “The Significance of Data-Sharing Policy” by Azkarov et al. (2023)

[*AoI = “Articles of Interest” is a feature of TRN where we report abstracts of recent research related to replication and research integrity.] ABSTRACT (taken from the article) “We assess the impact of mandating data-sharing in economics journals on two…

Read More

VON HIPPEL: When Does Science Self-Correct? Lessons from a Replication Crisis in Early 20th Century Chemistry

NOTE: This blog is a repost of one originally published at The Good Science Project (click here) Science is self-correcting—or so we are told. But in truth it can be very hard to expunge errors from the scientific record. In…

Read More

REED: Meta-Analysis and Univariate Regression Tests for Publication Bias – Seriously?

[This blog first appeared at the MAER-Net Blog under the title “Univariate Regression Tests for Publication Bias: Why Do We Do Them?”, see here] The FAT-PET Framework: A standard meta-analysis article goes something like this (see, for example, Knaisch and…

Read More

REED: More on Self-Correcting Science and Replications: A Critical Review

NOTE: This is a another long blog. Sorry about that! TL;DR: I provide a common framework for evaluating 5 recent papers and critically compare them. All of the papers have shortcomings. I argue that the view that the psychology papers represent…

Read More

REED: Is Science Self-Correcting? Evidence from 5 Recent Papers on the Effect of Replications on Citations

NOTE: This is a long blog. TL;DR: I discuss 5 papers and the identification strategies each use in their effort to identify a causal effect of replications on citations. One of the defining features of science is its ability to…

Read More

HIRSCHAUER, GRÜNER, & MUßHOFF: Fundamentals of Statistical Inference: What is the Meaning of Random Error?

This blog is based on the book of the same name by Norbert Hirschauer, Sven Grüner, and Oliver Mußhoff that was published in SpringerBriefs in Applied Statistics and Econometrics in August 2022. Starting from the premise that a lacking understanding…

Read More

REED & WU: EiR* – Missing Data

[* EiR = Econometrics in Replications, a feature of TRN that highlights useful econometrics procedures for re-analysing existing research.] NOTE: This blog uses Stata for its estimation. All the data and code necessary to reproduce the results in the tables…

Read More

BRODEUR: Launching the Institute for Replication (I4R)

Replication is key to the credibility and confidence in research findings. As falsification checks of past evidence, replication efforts contribute in essential ways to the production of scientific knowledge. They allow us to assess which findings are robust, making science…

Read More